The Sampson Family and the Huguenot Settlement at Manakin Town

The Sampson family of Virginia, descendants of the French Huguenot Francis “Francois” Sampson are first as part of the wave of French Protestants (1) who fled France after the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes on October 22, 1685. The Revocation triggered brutal persecution, forcing thousands of Huguenots (2) to escape first to England and the Channel Islands (3), and eventually to the American colonies. Virginia parish books of the early eighteenth century refer to these newcomers as the “poore French,” a phrase that reflects both their suffering and their precarious circumstances upon arrival.

Evran, Brittany is where Francis Sampson was probably from (mapquest)

What Francois Sampson and His Parents Likely Experienced After 1685

The Sampson family—like all French Protestants—was thrust into one of the most severe religious persecutions in early modern Europe. If Francois Sampson was born in 1679, probably in Evran in Brittany, he would have been a child of six when the Revocation occurred, and his parents would have faced immediate and escalating pressure from royal authorities.

·         Destruction of Churches and Loss of Legal Rights - The Revocation outlawed Protestant worship entirely. Huguenot churches were ordered destroyed, their ministers expelled, and all Protestant religious gatherings criminalized. In Brittany, dragoon units and royal officials enforced these measures aggressively. The Sampson family would have seen their local church closed or demolished, and their minister forced to flee or convert.

·         Forced Catholic Instruction - Children were a primary target of the new laws. Protestant parents were compelled to send their children to Catholic instruction under threat of fines, imprisonment, or loss of custody. Francois, as a young child, would have been required to attend Catholic catechism, and his parents would have been monitored for compliance.  The following is from The Huguenots in France and America by Charles Baird: (4) “Children were torn from their parents to be educated in the Roman Catholic religion..  Parents who refused to send their children to the priests were fined, imprisoned or deprived of them.”

·         Dragonnades and Military Intimidation - The dragonnades (5) were a campaign of state‑sanctioned terror launched by Louis XIV to destroy French Protestantism. Beginning in the 1680s and intensifying after the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, the crown quartered mounted soldiers—dragoons—in Protestant homes specifically to coerce conversions. These troops were encouraged to make life unbearable: destroying property, consuming all household food, preventing sleep, intimidating families, and threatening violence. Their goal was simple—force Protestants to sign abjurations, formal documents renouncing their faith. Although the dragonnades were most notorious in southern France, historians note that they were used throughout the kingdom, including Brittany, where families like the Sampsons lived and would have faced repeated visits from royal agents demanding submission to Catholicism.  The brutality of the dragonnades became one of the primary catalysts for the Huguenot exodus. Families fled secretly to England, the Channel Islands, and the Netherlands, and eventually to the American colonies—including Virginia. For many Huguenots, the dragonnades were not just harassment but a direct assault on their homes, livelihoods, and children, leaving them little choice but to escape France entirely.  The Sampsons likely faced repeated visits from royal agents demanding they renounce Protestantism. (6)

·         Economic Hardship and Social Isolation - Protestants lost the right to hold many professions, including medicine, law, printing, and government positions. Property could be seized, and business licenses revoked. The Sampson family—whatever their occupation—would have suffered economically, losing customers, legal protections, and community support. (5)

·         Prohibition on Emigration - The Revocation made it illegal for Protestants to leave France. Borders were patrolled, ports monitored, and permission denied. Attempting to flee was punishable by imprisonment, confiscation of property, or forced labor. Despite this, thousands escaped secretly. (5)  If the Sampsons later appear in English Huguenot records—as the surname does—it means they successfully evaded French authorities and crossed into England or the Channel Islands illegally.

·         Secret Worship and Underground Networks - Many Huguenots continued to worship in secret, meeting in forests, barns, or private homes. These “Churches of the Desert” were dangerous but essential for maintaining faith and community. The Sampson family likely participated in clandestine gatherings, relying on trusted neighbors and traveling ministers.

Did Francis Sampson travel alone to Virginia?

Although no surviving passenger list, parish entry, land patent, or court record identifies who accompanied Francois (Francis) Sampson to Virginia, the absence of documentation is typical for Huguenot refugees. These families often traveled in small, undocumented groups, and official records of their movements were rarely kept. Still, several indirect clues suggest that Francis may not have migrated entirely alone, but rather within a broader kinship or community network. The strongest hint comes from the Huguenot Parish Book, (7) which records the 1728 baptism of Anne Tammas and names Guillaume Samson as her godfather. This published transcription includes the entry:

“Anne Tammas, baptized 16 April 1728. Godfather: Guillaume Samson; Godmothers: Olive Salle, Briget.”

This is the exact record documenting Guillaume Samson’s presence in the Huguenot community and is the strongest evidence that another Samson—likely kin to Francis—was living near Manakin Town during this period.  The rarity of the Samson surname among Virginia Huguenots, combined with Guillaume’s presence as an adult in the same community, makes it likely that he was related to Francis—perhaps a brother, cousin, or nephew—though the record does not specify their relationship.

Huguenot families seldom emigrated alone; most left France in extended family groups, with neighbors from the same parish, or with members of the same refugee congregation in England or the Channel Islands. Because Francis came from Brittany, a region with smaller Protestant populations, it is historically probable that he migrated alongside people he knew.

The Huguenot Ship Lists (8)

Neither Francis Sampson nor William Sampson appear on the surviving ship lists for three of the five vessels that carried Huguenot refugees from London to Virginia in 1700–1701. Two of the ships have no known passenger lists at all, leaving the question of their presence unresolved. The final ship in the series was the William and Elizabeth, for which no list has been found. The first vessel, the Mary and Ann, arrived at Jamestown on July 31, 1700, carrying 205 passengers. From there, the refugees traveled by small boats up the James River to land recently vacated by the Monacan Indians, where they established their settlement, Manakin Town.

The second ship, the Peter and Anthony, reached Jamestown in September 1700 with 169 passengers, who continued on foot to Manakin Town. The third, the Nassau, received its permit to depart Kensington, England, on January 18, 1701, under Captain Tregian, and arrived in Virginia on March 5, 1701, sailing up the York River with 191 settlers aboard. These voyages collectively brought the core of the Huguenot community that founded Manakin Town, though no record confirms that Francis or William Sampson were among them.

Francis Samson arrived after the first flotilla of ships

By the early 1720s, France was no longer unleashing the violent dragonnades that had terrorized Protestant families in the previous decades, but the machinery of persecution remained firmly in place. The Revocation of the Edict of Nantes had never been reversed, and every law designed to extinguish Protestant life continued to operate. Public worship was still illegal, and no Protestant churches or ministers were permitted to function. Those who gathered secretly in the “Church of the Desert” risked imprisonment, fines, or worse. Families lived under constant pressure, knowing that their children were legally required to be raised Catholic and could be taken from them if they refused. Even marriage posed danger: unions involving Protestants were not recognized unless the Protestant spouse converted, and children born to Protestant parents could be declared illegitimate under French law.

Economic life offered no refuge. Many professions—law, medicine, printing, teaching, and government service—remained closed to Protestants, and guild membership required Catholic conformity. Property and inheritance laws continued to target Protestant families, and those who attempted to flee risked confiscation of their goods. Local officials monitored households, enforcing conformity through fines, legal threats, and social exclusion. Emigration itself was a crime, forcing those who escaped to do so secretly through Switzerland, the Netherlands, or the Channel ports. Despite these dangers, Huguenots continued to flee France well into the 1720s and 1730s. Refugee records from England, the Netherlands, the Channel Islands, South Carolina, New York, and Virginia all show new arrivals during this period, evidence that conditions in France remained harsh enough to drive Protestants from their homeland decades after the initial waves of persecution. (9)

His 1725 land patent directly across the James River from Manakin Town placed him within the same settlement corridor as other French families, suggesting he followed kin or community members already established there. This location was likely the result of both timing and policy. By the mid‑1720s, the original Huguenot lands at Manakin Town—granted in 1700 to the first wave of refugees—had already been divided among those families and their descendants. Later arrivals or second‑generation settlers often sought land nearby, where acreage was still available and fertile. The area across the river offered good soil, river access, and proximity to the established Huguenot community while remaining outside the original grant boundaries.

This is from R. A. Brock, Documents Relating to the Huguenot Emigration to Virginia (9)

“The lands allotted to the French refugees were divided among the several families… and by the second decade of the eighteenth century were already apportioned… Later arrivals, or those not included in the original distribution, obtained lands in the vicinity of the settlement.”

This is direct evidence that by the 1720s the Manakin Town grant was fully distributed, and newcomers or latecomers—like Francis Samson—had to patent land adjacent to the settlement rather than within it.  According to William Waller Hening, Statutes at Large of Virginia, Hening’s commentary on land grants confirms that the Manakin Town tract was a one‑time refugee grant, not a continuing distribution, therefore it was common for Huguenot descendants and associates to patent land adjacent to Manakin Town as the settlement expanded. Francis’s location suggests he was part of the same cultural and social network but obtained his property through the standard colonial land patent system, rather than through the original refugee allotments. His choice of land across the river provided both independence and connection—close enough to share in the Huguenot community’s life, yet distinct enough to establish his own farm and lineage in the growing Goochland frontier.

Francis and Bridget were buried at Boscobel in Goochland County

The Huguenot (1922) gives the location of the burial place of Francis and his wife Brittany as Boscobel in Goochland County.   (10) The text reads:

SAMPSON

1.        Francoise m Brigitte, both buried at Boscobel in Goochland.

Boscobel is part of the broader Manakin-Sabot area, which includes several small villages and unincorporated communities. It is not a large incorporated town but is recognized as a populated place in county records.

Francis Sampson’s choice of his children’s names—Stephen (Étienne), Priscilla, Anna, Sarah, Judith—reflects naming patterns common among Huguenot families in the region, hinting at cultural continuity typical of migrants who maintained close ties. While no document proves that Francis’s parents or siblings came with him, the presence of Guillaume Samson and the broader context of Huguenot migration strongly suggest that Francis was not the only Samson in early Virginia, and that he may have migrated with or soon after other relatives.

Manakin Town

In 1700, King William III granted 10,000 acres of land in Virginia specifically for the settlement of these refugees. Later that year, the Virginia House of Burgesses formally established a separate parish for them at Manakin Town, located above the falls of the James River. The Burgesses also granted the Huguenots seven years of tax exemption, recognizing the hardship they had endured and encouraging their resettlement on the frontier. (4)

Manakin Town in Virginia does not exist anymore as a settlement

Manakin Town became the center of Huguenot life in Virginia—a community of French-speaking families, ministers, and craftsmen who attempted to recreate aspects of their former lives while adapting to the challenges of the Virginia wilderness. Although the Sampson family did not settle directly inside Manakin Town, they lived immediately across the James River, placing them within the same cultural and migratory network.

Location of the Huguenot Settlement of Manakintown from the Historical Marker Database (11)

The Huguenot Parish Book, a fragmentary record published by the Virginia Historical Society, contains one early Sampson entry: the baptism of Anne Tammas on April 16, 1728, performed by Mr. Nairn, minister of Varina Parish. Her godfather was Guillaume Samson, and her godmothers were Olive Salle and Briget—names associated with the French refugee community. This entry demonstrates that Sampson family members were active participants in the Huguenot religious life of the region.

Three years before this baptism, Francois (Francis) Samson (12) patented land on March 24, 1725 directly across the James River from Manakin Town, in what later became Goochland County. (13 p. 11) This land patent marks the beginning of the Sampson family’s documented presence in Virginia. Francis’s will, probated March 19, 1744, identifies his wife Brigitte, his “only son” Stephen (Étienne), and four daughters: Priscilla New, Anna Fuqua, Sarah Maxey, and Judith Crouch, each named with one child. These names appear repeatedly in Goochland County records and demonstrate the family’s integration into the broader Huguenot‑influenced community.

The Sampsons’ proximity to Manakin Town, their appearance in Huguenot parish records, and their landholding along the James River place them firmly within the Huguenot diaspora that shaped early Goochland County. Their story reflects the broader experience of French Protestant refugees who rebuilt their lives in Virginia—maintaining cultural ties to their heritage while becoming part of the fabric of colonial society.

Timeline Chart: Sampson Settlement & Huguenot Migration (1685–1768)

Date	Event	General Information
22 Oct 1685	Revocation of the Edict of Nantes	Louis XIV outlawed Protestantism; Huguenots fled France. The Sampson family belonged to this refugee stream from Brittany.
1685–1700	Huguenot Refuge in England & Channel Islands	French refugees registered in the French Churches of London (Threadneedle Street), Canterbury, and Channel Islands. Sampson surname appears in these records.
1700	King William III grants 10,000 acres in Virginia	Land reserved for Huguenot settlement. Refugees called “poore French” in parish books.
Dec 1700	Virginia House of Burgesses establishes Manakin Town Parish	A separate parish created for Huguenots “above the falls of the James River.” Settlers exempted from taxes for seven years.
24 Mar 1725	Francois (Francis) Samson patents land in Virginia	Land located directly across the James River from Manakin Town, in what became Goochland County. First confirmed Sampson landholding in Virginia. (14)
16 Apr 1728	Baptism of Anne Tammas	Recorded in the Huguenot Parish Book. Godfather: Guillaume Samson; godmothers: Olive Salle and Briget. Demonstrates Sampson participation in Huguenot religious life.
16 Aug 1729	Stephen “Étienne” Sampson marries Mary Woodson	Recorded in The Douglas Register, St. James Northam Parish, Goochland County. Connects Huguenot Sampsons to the English Woodson family.
19 Mar 1744	Will of Francois Samson probated	Names wife Brigitte, “only son” Stephen, and daughters Priscilla New, Anna Fuqua, Sarah Maxey, and Judith Crouch. Establishes the Sampson family structure.
1757	Will of Bridgett Bryell Sampson (Francis’s widow)	Names “Judith Sampson, daughter of Stephen Sampson,” confirming Judith’s parentage.
17 Feb 1766	Stephen Sampson writes his will	Leaves property to wife Mary and children. Demonstrates continued Sampson presence in Goochland County.
15 Mar 1768	Will of Stephen Sampson proved	Confirms his death before this date.
17 May 1768	Estate inventory of Stephen Sampson presented	Marks the final documented event in the Sampson Huguenot timeline. Judith Sampson, his daughter, had already married John Woodall (15) by this time.

Life in the Huguenot Settlement at Manakin Town

Life in Manakin Town, founded in 1700 on the south bank of the James River, was shaped by both hardship and resilience. The families who settled there (16) arrived in Virginia (17) exhausted, impoverished, and determined to rebuild their lives. Many had spent years in exile in England or the Channel Islands before crossing the Atlantic. When they reached Virginia, they were known in parish records as the “poore French,” a phrase that captured both their suffering and their precarious circumstances.

The land granted to them—10,000 acres donated by King William III—was untouched wilderness. There were no houses, cleared fields, or infrastructure. The settlers’ first homes were rough log cabins, often shared by multiple families. The early years were marked by scarcity: food shortages, harsh winters, disease, and a lack of tools and livestock. (9)Recognizing their vulnerability, the Virginia House of Burgesses created a separate parish for them at Manakin Town and granted them seven years of tax exemption to help them stabilize.

Despite these challenges, Manakin Town remained distinctly French in its early decades. The settlers organized themselves around a French-speaking minister, maintained French naming patterns, and preserved French marriage networks among families such as Salle (18), Chastain, Flournoy, Michaux, Agee, and others. The church was the center of community life, and although many parish records survive only in fragments, they show baptisms, marriages, and burials conducted in French. (19)

Agriculture was central to survival. The settlers attempted to recreate the farming practices they had known in France, but the Virginia climate and soil demanded adaptation. They learned to grow corn—unfamiliar to many—alongside wheat, barley, orchard fruits, and tobacco, the colony’s cash crop. Clearing land was labor-intensive, and families worked communally, helping one another cut timber, build cabins, and plant fields. (19)

Many Huguenots were skilled artisans—silk weavers, goldsmiths, millers, and merchants. In Virginia, they had to reinvent themselves as farmers, but their craftsmanship shaped the settlement. Mills were built along creeks, blacksmiths repaired tools, weavers produced cloth, and shoemakers and tanners supplied leather goods. These trades helped the community become self-sufficient. (19)

Relations with English neighbors were initially distant. Manakin Town was culturally distinct from surrounding English plantations, and early observers described the settlers as industrious but impoverished. Over time, however, the Huguenots integrated into the broader Virginia society. They learned English, traded with nearby plantations, and intermarried with English families such as the Woodsons, Randolphs, and Flemings.

The Sampson family, though not living inside Manakin Town, settled directly across the James River on land patented in 1725. (14) They participated in the same parish networks, shared godparents with Manakin Town families, and lived within sight of the settlement. Their daily life mirrored that of the Huguenots—frontier farming, communal labor, and gradual integration into English Virginia.

As the eighteenth century progressed, the Virginia frontier moved steadily westward, leaving the original Manakin Town settlement behind. The Huguenot families who had first clustered together gradually dispersed onto individual farms and plantations, becoming increasingly indistinguishable from their English neighbors. Intermarriage accelerated assimilation, sons moved away in search of opportunity, and daughters often married into English families. By around 1750, the village itself had been abandoned, though French names still dominated the surrounding area for decades—so much so that in 1783, sixty‑four percent of the local census entries were of French origin, and even a century and a half later Powhatan County retained the highest concentration of French surnames in Virginia. (20)

Little remains of the original settlement today except the King William Parish church, rebuilt on a different site. The industries and commercial ventures once envisioned for Manakin Town never materialized; the demands of frontier life pushed the Huguenots into agriculture, where the soil, climate, and the plantation system shaped their economic future. Over time, the French language and distinct cultural traits faded, absorbed into the broader English colonial society. Yet this assimilation enriched Virginia, not through a preserved enclave of French culture, but through the contributions of individual Huguenots and their descendants. The brief history of Manakin Town stands as a testament to the Huguenots’ search for religious freedom, the pragmatic policies of the Virginia government, and the powerful force of economic necessity in reshaping immigrant communities on the colonial frontier. (20) 

Works Cited

1. Registers of the French Church of London (Threadneedle Street). Publications of the Huguenot Society of London, Multiple Volumes. [Online]

2. Registers of the French Church of Canterbury. Huguenot Society of London Publications, Series I. [Online]

3. Channel Islands Huguenot Refugee Lists. Publications of the Huguenot Society of London, Various volumes. [Online]

4. Baird, Charles W. The Huguenots in France and America. New York : Dodd, Mead & Co., 1885.

5. Labrousse, Elisabeth. The Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. s.l. : Cambridge University Press. Explains extension of dragonnade tactics beyond southern France and details military coercion of Protestant families.

6. Garrisson, Janine. A History of the Huguenots. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1991.

7. The Huguenot Society of the Founders of Manakin in the Colony of Virginia. Published in: The Huguenot, Vol. 24 (1921), pp. 65–66 : s.n., Huguenot Parish Register (King William Parish), 1721–1744.

8. Manakintown Huguenot Ship Lists. The Huguenot Society the Founders of Manakin in the Colony of Virginia. [Online] https://www.huguenotmanakin.org/manakintown-huguenot-ship-list.

9. Brock, R. A. Documents Relating to the Huguenot Emigration to Virginia. Virginia Historical Society. [Online] (Virginia Historical Society Collections, Vol. 5, 1886).

10. Francoise Samson. WikiTree. [Online] https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Sampson-700.

11. Location of Manakintown. Historical Marker Database. [Online] https://www.hmdb.org/map.asp?markers=18363,18366,18365,21142,21141,21143,18332,18399,295433,295436,217426.

12. Douglas, William, edited by W. Macfarlane Jones. The Douglas Register. Richmond : J.W. Fergusson & Sons, 1928.

13. Unknown, Author. Kith and Kin: Written for the Children of Mr. and Mrs. John Russell Sampson. ancestry.com. [Online] https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/12620/images/dvm_GenMono001858.

14. Francoise Sampson. WikiTree. [Online] https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Sampson-700.

15. Early Southside Virginia Families. cottage hill. [Online] John Woodall. http://cottagehill.com/southside/f1006.htm.

16. Registers of the French Church of London (Threadneedle Street). Publications of the Huguenot Society of London. [Online]

17. Gwynn, John. Huguenot Refugees in the Settling of Virginia. Virginia Historical Society Papers. [Online]

18. There was an Abraham Salle in the Tithes List in 1711. partial thithable listing manakin Town June 1711. [Online] Piedmont Trails, Interesting Discoveries in Manakin Town, Virginia 1700-1711. https://piedmonttrails.com/2024/08/18/interesting-discoveries-in-manakin-town-virginia-1700-1711/.

19. Huguenot Society of the Founders of Manakin in the Colony of Virginia. Manakin Town Records. [Online]

20. By James L. Bugg, Jr. [retired president of Old Dominion University]. The French Huguenot Frontier Settlement of Manakin Town. The Huguenot Society the Founders of. [Online] Published in the Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, 61:4, October 1953, pp. 359-392. https://www.huguenotmanakin.org/huguenot-settlement-of-manakin-town.

© 2026 Catherine L. Gauldin, Gaulding Origins. All original content protected. Use of this site implies agreement with the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.